The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
The Islamic Republic’s Power Centers
English Summary
CFR’s core finding is that Iran’s system is institutionally complex but functionally centered on the supreme leader’s clerical-security network, which constrains elected officials and limits meaningful reform. The article’s reasoning maps how formal bodies—the presidency, majlis, Guardian Council, Expediency Council, Assembly of Experts, and Supreme National Security Council—are structurally shaped by appointment authority, candidate vetting, and IRGC-linked influence tied to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It argues that recent shocks, including the June 2025 Israeli strikes and the late-2025/2026 protest wave, exposed regime vulnerabilities, yet the state’s coercive response also demonstrated enduring control by hard-line power centers. The policy implication is that strategy toward Tehran should focus on the supreme leader’s orbit and security institutions, combining calibrated pressure and diplomacy while preparing for episodic instability rather than expecting elected offices alone to drive change.
中文摘要
外交關係協會（CFR）的核心發現是：伊朗體制在制度層面雖然複雜，但在實際運作上以最高領袖主導的教士—安全網絡為中心，因而牽制民選官員並限制具實質意義的改革。文章論證梳理了正式機構——總統職位、伊斯蘭議會（Majlis）、監護委員會、權宜委員會、專家會議與最高國家安全委員會——如何在任命權、候選人審查，以及與阿亞圖拉阿里・哈米尼相連並受伊斯蘭革命衛隊（IRGC）影響的權力結構下被塑造。文章主張，近期衝擊（包括2025年6月以色列的打擊行動，以及2025年底至2026年的抗議浪潮）暴露了政權脆弱性；然而，國家以強制手段回應，也顯示強硬派權力核心仍具持久控制力。其政策意涵是：對德黑蘭的策略應聚焦最高領袖權力圈與安全機構，在校準式施壓與外交並行下，同時為間歇性不穩定預作準備，而非期待僅靠民選職位推動變革。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.