The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The Fed’s Post-2008 Powers Are a Fiscal Time Bomb
English Summary
The article argues that the Federal Reserve's post-2008 powers, particularly the ability to pay interest on reserves, have dangerously blurred the lines between monetary policy and fiscal spending, creating a 'fiscal time bomb.' This mechanism allows the Fed to easily accommodate excessive government debt spending, effectively enabling debt monetization and undermining the separation established by the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord. To mitigate this risk, the author recommends that the Fed must shrink its balance sheet and, critically, that Congress revoke the authority to pay interest on reserves. These reforms are necessary to restore the Fed's independence and prevent the government from using the central bank for backdoor fiscal expenditures.
中文摘要
本文論述聯邦儲備系統（Federal Reserve）自2008年後所擁有的權力，特別是支付準備金利息的能力，已危險地模糊了貨幣政策與財政支出之間的界線，從而構成了「財政定時炸彈」。這種機制使得聯準會能夠輕易地配合過度的政府債務支出，實質上促成了債務貨幣化，並動搖了1951年《財政部－聯準會協定》所確立的區隔。為緩解此風險，作者建議聯準會必須縮減其資產負債表，且關鍵性地，國會必須取消支付準備金利息的權力。這些改革對於恢復聯準會的獨立性，並防止政府利用中央銀行進行「後門」式的財政支出，是至關重要的。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.