The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
How the Welfare State’s Financing Structure Enables Waste, Fraud, and Abuse
English Summary
This CATO Institute report argues that federal-state financing structures for welfare programs create misaligned incentives that encourage widespread fraud and fiscal exploitation. Because states administer programs like SNAP and Medicaid while federal taxpayers bear the majority of costs, states lack the financial motivation to prevent improper payments or close administrative loopholes. The author recommends transitioning to block grants or per-capita spending caps to force states to take greater responsibility for program integrity. Ultimately, the report contends that ending federal aid to state programs is necessary to ensure policymakers remain accountable to taxpayers for every dollar spent.
中文摘要
這份卡托研究所（CATO Institute）的報告指出，社會福利計畫的聯邦與州政府共同融資結構造成了誘因失調，進而助長廣泛的欺詐與財政剝削。由於各州負責管理補充營養協助計畫（SNAP）和醫療補助（Medicaid）等項目，卻由聯邦納稅人承擔大部分成本，導致州政府缺乏預防不當支付或堵塞行政漏洞的財務動機。作者建議轉向統籌撥款（block grants）或人均支出上限，以迫使州政府對計畫的健全性承擔更大責任。最終，報告主張，唯有終止聯邦對州政府計畫的資助，才能確保決策者對納稅人所支出的每一分錢負責。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.