The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
What Should Policy Do About Carbon Emissions?
English Summary
The article argues that while carbon emissions are a significant externality, traditional clean energy subsidies are an inefficient 'blunt instrument' because they reduce total energy costs and create distorted incentives. A theoretically superior approach is a Pigouvian carbon tax, as it unambiguously raises the price of carbon-based energy, encouraging efficiency. However, due to the political unpopularity and measurement difficulties of carbon taxes, the authors conclude that the most practical, least harmful policy response may be doing nothing, other than eliminating existing subsidies for carbon-based fuels.
中文摘要
本文論述，儘管碳排放是顯著的外部性，但傳統的清潔能源補貼卻是一種效率低下的「粗放工具」，因為它們降低了總能源成本並創造了扭曲的激勵機制。理論上更優越的方法是實施皮古稅碳稅，因為它能明確提高碳基能源的價格，從而鼓勵提高效率。然而，由於碳稅在政治上不受歡迎且衡量困難，作者們結論認為，最實際、傷害最小的政策應對可能是「不採取行動」，除了廢除現有的碳基燃料補貼之外。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
3.
The article advocates for educational freedom, arguing that rigid public school models fail to meet the diverse needs of modern families. It highlights alternative learning centers, such as Tranquil Teachings, which offer highly flexible, personalized curricula that integrate academics, arts, agriculture, and civic education. This model emphasizes community building and holistic development, prioritizing parental choice over standardized mandates. For policy, the findings suggest a strategic shift toward expanding school choice and protecting decentralized, community-driven educational environments, rather than relying on centralized, standardized state systems.
-
4.
Voter sentiment overwhelmingly rejects the current tariff status quo, viewing tariffs as a significant source of inflation and economic harm. The article argues that Democrats must capitalize on this political momentum by fundamentally reforming or repealing overly broad and anachronistic trade statutes (Sections 232, 301, and 338). Strategically, Congress should repeal outdated provisions and reform remaining authorities to narrow definitions and mandate explicit congressional approval for any future tariff actions. This policy shift aims to curb unilateral presidential power and restore legislative control over U.S. trade policy.
-
5.
The core finding is that the stability and success of any political system depend less on its formal institutions and more on the moral sentiments and ethical character of its citizens. The analysis argues that ethics guides all human relationships, rendering clever institutional designs—such as the separation of powers—ineffective if the populace lacks a virtuous concern for the public good. Consequently, policy and strategic efforts must prioritize fostering ethical discourse and individual liberty (liberalism) rather than relying on state coercion or attempting to mandate equality of outcome. The implication is that structural reforms alone are insufficient; true progress requires cultivating a responsible, self-respecting citizenry.