The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Doing Away with Quarterly Reporting: The Right Step for the Wrong Reason
English Summary
The CATO analysis argues against the SEC’s proposed shift to semiannual financial reporting, contending that the justification of reducing short-termism is unsupported by evidence. Research, including a 2018 review and analysis of corporate investment and share repurchases, demonstrates that quarterly reporting has not demonstrably caused short-termism. Furthermore, the UK’s experience following its own mandated quarterly reporting revealed no impact on valuations, while highlighting the significant costs associated with the requirement. The core argument centers on restoring self-determination to companies and investors regarding reporting frequency, a principle supported by historical trends and cost savings.
中文摘要
CATO 的分析認為，證監會提出的將財務報告頻率調整為半年一次的提案缺乏依據，其聲稱旨在減少短期主義的理由並未得到充分支持。研究，包括 2018 年對企業投資和股權回購的審查與分析，表明季度報告並未顯著導致短期主義。此外，英國在實施強制季度報告後沒有發現對估值的影響，同時也凸顯了該要求所帶來的巨大成本。核心論點是恢復企業和投資者就報告頻率自主決定的權利，這一原則得到了歷史趨勢和成本節約的支撐。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.