The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Health Insurance Affordability: The Trump Administration Overthinks a Short Putt
English Summary
CATO’s analysis criticizes the Trump administration’s approach to addressing health insurance affordability, specifically its focus on a temporary regulation change for ‘short-term limited duration insurance’ (STLDI) plans. The administration’s 2018 rule, which clarified the legality of longer-term STLDI contracts and resulted in stabilized Obamacare premiums and increased enrollment, was a successful response to prior Obama-era restrictions. However, the administration’s current strategy of relying solely on a short-lived regulatory fix represents a missed opportunity, lacking the permanence needed to incentivize insurer investment and address underlying affordability issues. The author advocates for a legislative solution to permanently codify the Trump rule, arguing that a regulatory-only approach is ultimately unsustainable and politically ineffective.
中文摘要
CATO 的分析批評了特朗普政府在解決醫療保險可負擔性方面的方法，尤其是在其對『短期限期保險』(STLDI) 計劃的重點上。特朗普政府於 2018 年頒布的規則，該規則闡明了更長期限的 STLDI 合法性，並導致奧巴馬時期保險費穩定和報名人數增加，是對先前奧巴馬政府限制的成功應對。然而，政府目前僅依賴短期補救措施的策略，錯失了永久性解決方案的機會，缺乏鼓勵保險公司投資和解決根本可負擔性問題所需的持久性。作者主張通過立法永久編碼特朗普規則，認為僅僅依靠監管方法最終是不可持續的，並且在政治上也缺乏有效性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.