The Cato Institute warns that the USPS's current handling of mail balloting poses a significant risk of systemic failure ahead of major elections. Key concerns include whistleblower allegations regarding 'batch rejection protocols,' which could invalidate thousands of legitimate ballots, coupled with documented slowdowns in delivery speed and increased rejections for lateness. This instability suggests potential operational or political interference aimed at undermining mail voting integrity. Consequently, the article advises that voters and state election officials must plan to bypass the USPS system by utilizing alternative secure methods, such as drop boxes or early in-person voting, to ensure timely ballot submission.
Friday Feature: Hilton Horizons Academy
English Summary
This article highlights Hilton Horizons Academy as a successful example of the microschool movement, offering a student-centered alternative to the rigid testing and bureaucracy of traditional public schools. By utilizing personalized curricula and hands-on enrichment—such as robotics and gardening—the academy effectively addresses individual student needs that the standard system often overlooks. The school’s growth and the high satisfaction of its staff underscore the importance of school choice initiatives, such as Tennessee’s education savings account program, which make these models accessible to a broader range of families. These findings suggest that diversifying educational options can improve both teacher retention and student achievement by fostering more adaptive learning environments.
中文摘要
本文強調 Hilton Horizons Academy 是微型學校運動的一個成功範例，為傳統公立學校僵化的考試制度與官僚體系提供了一個以學生為中心的替代方案。透過個人化課程和實踐性豐富活動（如機器人技術和園藝），該學院有效滿足了標準體系經常忽視的學生個人需求。該校的成長和教職員的高滿意度凸顯了教育選擇權倡議（如田納西州的教育儲蓄帳戶計畫）的重要性，這些計畫使更多家庭能夠接觸到這類模式。研究結果顯示，多元化的教育選擇能透過營造更具適應性的學習環境，同時提高教師留任率與學生成就。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the United States' aggressive use of tariffs and economic coercion is counterproductive, inspiring international partners to actively circumvent US markets. Instead of increasing dependency on American trade, major global players are deepening cooperation by establishing new free trade agreements (e.g., EU-India, ACFTA, CPTPP) that explicitly exclude the U.S. This trend signals a significant shift toward increased global economic integration outside of US influence. Policymakers should recognize this accelerating decoupling, as it suggests that the traditional American model of trade leverage is rapidly diminishing unless the U.S. commits to upholding multilateral rules and reducing protectionism.
-
3.
The article argues that passing a Continuing Resolution (CR), while preventing an immediate government shutdown, merely preserves an unsustainable fiscal status quo rather than addressing underlying budgetary crises. Congress is criticized for using the CR as an escape route from difficult choices—such as cutting programs or tackling massive deficits—while simultaneously planning to increase debt through reconciliation packages for defense and agriculture. The core problem remains mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare) driving debt unsustainably. For genuine fiscal stability, the author advises that Congress must move beyond short-term funding measures, prioritize essential functions, and establish a dedicated process to impose discipline on mandatory programs.
-
4.
The article argues that inheritance and estate taxes are detrimental to economic growth, investment, and productivity. Citing Sweden's experience after abolishing the gift and inheritance tax in 2005, the author notes subsequent increases in firm profitability, net sales, and asset values. The core reasoning suggests that removing these taxes allows owner-managers to reinvest capital directly into their companies rather than withdrawing funds for anticipated future tax liabilities. This increased internal investment has been shown to boost corporate financial health and higher corporate income tax payments.
-
5.
The CATO article argues that the US-Venezuela oil deal is deeply problematic due to significant governance and ethical concerns. Key criticisms include a lack of transparency in negotiations, the expansion of state corporatism through government involvement in resource extraction, and questionable legality since it bypasses Venezuelan constitutional requirements. Furthermore, the agreement utilizes a notoriously corrupt private partner and sidelines the democratic opposition, severely undermining US credibility and future diplomatic efforts. Strategically, the deal is viewed as an ill-advised 'imperial resource grab' that risks damaging long-term American influence in Latin America.