The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Latest Waiver Is Another Indictment of the Jones Act
English Summary
The CATO Institute argues that the Trump administration's 60-day Jones Act waiver for energy and fertilizer shipments is an implicit admission that the law itself is a supply chain impediment rather than a national security asset. The article notes that only a tiny fraction of global vessels comply with the Jones Act—zero oceangoing dry bulk ships for fertilizer, one LNG tanker, and just 54 oil tankers out of nearly 7,500 worldwide—while US shipbuilding is in 'near total collapse' and the Jones Act-compliant fleet has halved since 1980. CATO contends that rather than relying on legally questionable temporary waivers, Congress should repeal the Jones Act entirely to permanently lower shipping costs, strengthen supply chains, and develop a more effective maritime policy.
中文摘要
卡托研究所主張，川普政府針對能源及肥料運輸發布的60天《乾斯法案》豁免令，實質上等同承認該法律本身是供應鏈的阻礙，而非國家安全資產。文章指出，全球僅極少數船舶符合《乾斯法案》規定——肥料用遠洋散裝船為零、液化天然氣船僅一艘、油輪在全球近7,500艘中僅54艘——而美國造船業已「近乎全面崩潰」，符合該法案的船隊規模自1980年以來已減半。卡托研究所認為，與其依賴法律上存疑的臨時豁免措施，國會應徹底廢除《乾斯法案》，以永久降低航運成本、強化供應鏈，並制定更具成效的海事政策。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.