The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Will Trump’s Next Tariffs Be a “Sham,” Too?
English Summary
This analysis argues that the administration's planned tariffs under Section 301 are likely a 'sham' because the decision to impose them appears predetermined, regardless of the investigation's findings. The author critiques the USTR's methodology for determining 'Structural Excess Capacity' (SEC), citing that the process relies on arbitrary benchmarks (such as the 80% utilization rate) and fails to establish clear causal links. Furthermore, the piece notes that the U.S. government itself utilizes numerous non-market policies and subsidies, suggesting that the US should examine its own trade practices rather than solely focusing on foreign nations. Consequently, the article warns that the impending tariffs may be based on legally and economically dubious data, signaling a potential overreach in US trade policy.
中文摘要
本分析指出，行政部門根據《301條款》計劃徵收的關稅很可能屬於「虛設」性質，因為其徵收決定似乎是預先定案的，與調查結果無關。作者批評了美國貿易代表署（USTR）在確定「結構性過剩產能」（SEC）時所採用的方法論，指出該過程依賴於武斷的基準（例如80%的利用率），且未能建立清晰的因果關係。此外，文章提到美國政府自身也實施了許多非市場政策和補貼，暗示美國應檢視自身的貿易實踐，而非僅專注於外國國家。因此，本文警告稱，這些即將實施的關稅可能基於法律和經濟上可疑的數據，預示著美國貿易政策可能存在權力過度擴張的風險。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.