The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
US Fiscal Dominance, the Coming Fiscal Inflection Point, and How Congress Can Fix the Debt Crisis (Before It’s Too Late)
English Summary
The United States faces an imminent risk of 'fiscal dominance,' where unsustainable federal debt levels may eventually force the Federal Reserve to abandon its inflation-control mandate to finance government spending. Projections indicate that by 2036, mandatory spending on entitlements and interest payments will consume 100% of federal revenue, with the impending depletion of Social Security and Medicare trust funds by 2032 serving as a critical market inflection point. To avert a sovereign debt crisis and persistent inflation, Congress must implement structural entitlement reforms, establish a credible deficit target of 3% of GDP, and utilize a bipartisan fiscal commission to overcome political inertia.
中文摘要
美國面臨「財政主導」（fiscal dominance）的迫切風險，即不可持續的聯邦債務水平最終可能迫使聯準會放棄其控制通膨的職責，轉而為政府支出提供資金。預測顯示，到 2036 年，福利計畫與利息支出的強制性支出將消耗聯邦總收入的 100%，而社會安全金與醫療保險信託基金預計將於 2032 年耗盡，這將成為市場的一個關鍵轉折點。為避免主權債務危機和持續性通膨，國會必須實施結構性的福利計畫改革，設定佔 GDP 3% 的可靠赤字目標，並利用跨黨派財政委員會來克服政治慣性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.