The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
A Warning On Centralized OMB Grant Review
English Summary
The OMB's proposed centralization of federal grantmaking poses a significant threat to academic freedom and scientific research by requiring all discretionary awards to 'demonstrably advance the president’s policy priorities.' Critics argue that this mechanism centralizes control under an elastic standard, creating a system of low-trust review that increases politicization rather than reducing it. By making OMB guidance binding regulation without traditional agency rulemaking, the proposal grants excessive executive power over specialized scientific and health research fields. If implemented, these rules risk undermining American institutional stability and could severely damage the integrity of national science.
中文摘要
管理預算辦公室（OMB）提議將聯邦撥款進行中央集權，這對學術自由和科學研究構成重大威脅，因為該提案要求所有酌情撥款必須「可證明推進總統的政策優先事項」。批評人士指出，此機制是在一個彈性標準下集中了控制權，建立了一個低信任度的審查系統，從而增加了政治化而非減少。由於該提案在沒有傳統機構制定規則的情況下使OMB指導具有約束力，它授予了行政部門過大的權力，尤其是在專業科學和健康研究領域。如果實施，這些規定有損美國的制度穩定性，並可能嚴重损害國家科學的完整性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.