The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
The AI Panic Is Producing Terrible Tax Ideas
English Summary
The article argues that calls for new taxes on AI or computing power are based on flawed economic premises, specifically the false narrative of labor losing to capital. Empirical evidence contradicts this panic, showing that technology generally complements work by enhancing productivity rather than simply replacing it. Furthermore, implementing a compute tax would be economically damaging because taxing intermediate inputs raises costs across all final goods and slows down the necessary investment required for wage growth. Policymakers should therefore avoid distorting capital markets with new taxes and instead focus on improving existing tax structures to ensure supernormal returns are fully captured.
中文摘要
本文論證，呼籲對人工智慧或運算能力徵收新稅的基礎是錯誤的經濟前提，特別是基於「勞動敗給資本」的虛假敘事。實證證據反駁了這種恐慌，顯示技術通常透過提升生產力來輔助工作，而非單純地取代工作。此外，實施運算稅在經濟上將產生損害，因為對中間投入品課稅會提高所有最終商品的成本，並減緩 wage growth 所必需的投資。因此，政策制定者應避免用新稅扭曲資本市場，而應專注於改善現有的稅制結構，以確保超額回報（supernormal returns）能夠得到充分捕捉。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.