The Cato Institute warns that the USPS's current handling of mail balloting poses a significant risk of systemic failure ahead of major elections. Key concerns include whistleblower allegations regarding 'batch rejection protocols,' which could invalidate thousands of legitimate ballots, coupled with documented slowdowns in delivery speed and increased rejections for lateness. This instability suggests potential operational or political interference aimed at undermining mail voting integrity. Consequently, the article advises that voters and state election officials must plan to bypass the USPS system by utilizing alternative secure methods, such as drop boxes or early in-person voting, to ensure timely ballot submission.
Public Defenders: The Friction in the Machine
English Summary
This article argues that public defenders serve as an essential check on state power in the criminal justice system, acting as 'friction in the machine' that prevents governmental overreach and protects constitutional rights. Drawing on the author's experience as a public defender in Pueblo, Colorado, and the legacy of Gideon v. Wainwright, the piece contends that plea-driven mass adjudication has displaced jury trials while jails overflow with low-level offenders even as clearance rates for serious crimes decline. The author highlights that with over 5,000 federal statutory crimes and 400,000 regulatory offenses, virtually anyone could face prosecution, making robust public defense a universal safeguard. The implications point toward the need for greater investment in indigent defense and reforms to bail and plea-bargaining systems to restore the adversarial process the Framers intended.
中文摘要
本文主張，公設辯護人在刑事司法體系中扮演制衡國家權力的關鍵角色，猶如「機器中的摩擦力」，防止政府權力過度擴張並捍衛憲法權利。作者援引自身在科羅拉多州普韋布洛擔任公設辯護人的經驗，以及「乙乙案訴溫賴特案」（Gideon v. Wainwright）的司法遺產，指出認罪協商驅動的大規模裁決已取代陪審團審判，監獄因輕罪犯罪者而人滿為患，重大犯罪的破案率卻持續下降。作者強調，鑑於聯邦法律中超過五千項法定罪名及四十萬項行政違規條款，幾乎任何人都可能面臨起訴，因此健全的公設辯護制度實為全民的普遍保障。文章指出，應加大對貧困被告辯護的投資，並改革保釋及認罪協商制度，以恢復制憲者所設想的對抗式訴訟程序。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the United States' aggressive use of tariffs and economic coercion is counterproductive, inspiring international partners to actively circumvent US markets. Instead of increasing dependency on American trade, major global players are deepening cooperation by establishing new free trade agreements (e.g., EU-India, ACFTA, CPTPP) that explicitly exclude the U.S. This trend signals a significant shift toward increased global economic integration outside of US influence. Policymakers should recognize this accelerating decoupling, as it suggests that the traditional American model of trade leverage is rapidly diminishing unless the U.S. commits to upholding multilateral rules and reducing protectionism.
-
3.
The article argues that passing a Continuing Resolution (CR), while preventing an immediate government shutdown, merely preserves an unsustainable fiscal status quo rather than addressing underlying budgetary crises. Congress is criticized for using the CR as an escape route from difficult choices—such as cutting programs or tackling massive deficits—while simultaneously planning to increase debt through reconciliation packages for defense and agriculture. The core problem remains mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare) driving debt unsustainably. For genuine fiscal stability, the author advises that Congress must move beyond short-term funding measures, prioritize essential functions, and establish a dedicated process to impose discipline on mandatory programs.
-
4.
The article argues that inheritance and estate taxes are detrimental to economic growth, investment, and productivity. Citing Sweden's experience after abolishing the gift and inheritance tax in 2005, the author notes subsequent increases in firm profitability, net sales, and asset values. The core reasoning suggests that removing these taxes allows owner-managers to reinvest capital directly into their companies rather than withdrawing funds for anticipated future tax liabilities. This increased internal investment has been shown to boost corporate financial health and higher corporate income tax payments.
-
5.
The CATO article argues that the US-Venezuela oil deal is deeply problematic due to significant governance and ethical concerns. Key criticisms include a lack of transparency in negotiations, the expansion of state corporatism through government involvement in resource extraction, and questionable legality since it bypasses Venezuelan constitutional requirements. Furthermore, the agreement utilizes a notoriously corrupt private partner and sidelines the democratic opposition, severely undermining US credibility and future diplomatic efforts. Strategically, the deal is viewed as an ill-advised 'imperial resource grab' that risks damaging long-term American influence in Latin America.