The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Trump’s Presidential Portfolio Goes Quantum
English Summary
The article argues that the Trump administration is expanding its reach into private technology sectors, exemplified by the Commerce Department's plan to provide $2 billion in federal incentives to quantum computing firms in exchange for minority equity stakes. The author contends that this pattern is not legitimate investment but an improvised effort to create a pseudo-sovereign wealth fund under executive control. This practice is criticized for distorting competition, politicizing private investment, and undermining American capitalism by building a patronage market through government ownership by press release. The policy implication is that such federal overreach risks misallocating taxpayer capital and giving political officials undue influence over critical private industries.
中文摘要
本文論述川普政府正將其影響力擴展至私營科技領域，其例證為商務部計劃提供價值20億美元的聯邦激勵資金給量子計算公司，以換取少數股權。作者主張，這種模式並非合法的投資行為，而是一種試圖在行政部門控制下建立虛假主權財富基金的臨時性努力。此類做法被批評為扭曲市場競爭、將私人投資政治化，並透過政府發布的新聞稿建立一種庇護式市場，從而損害了美國資本主義。政策意涵是，此類聯邦過度干預的行為，有誤用納稅人資本、並讓政治官員對關鍵私營產業產生不當影響的風險。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.