The Cato Institute warns that the USPS's current handling of mail balloting poses a significant risk of systemic failure ahead of major elections. Key concerns include whistleblower allegations regarding 'batch rejection protocols,' which could invalidate thousands of legitimate ballots, coupled with documented slowdowns in delivery speed and increased rejections for lateness. This instability suggests potential operational or political interference aimed at undermining mail voting integrity. Consequently, the article advises that voters and state election officials must plan to bypass the USPS system by utilizing alternative secure methods, such as drop boxes or early in-person voting, to ensure timely ballot submission.
Duvall v. Maryland Brief: Protecting the Right to Interstate Travel While Armed
English Summary
The brief argues that states should not possess the power to arbitrarily restrict an individual's constitutional right to carry firearms when traveling from another state. Using the example of a man arrested in Maryland despite possessing a valid out-of-state permit, the article highlights how some jurisdictions treat interstate visitors as if they were 'suspect foreigners.' The core reasoning is that this practice undermines the general right to self-defense affirmed by the Supreme Court and creates unnecessary legal hurdles for American citizens. Policy implications center on utilizing legal challenges (amicus briefs) to compel state courts to respect out-of-state permits, ensuring consistent protection of fundamental rights across all state lines.
中文摘要
本簡報論述，國家不應擁有任意限制個人在跨州旅行時攜帶槍械的憲法權利。文章以一名在馬里蘭州被捕、但持有有效外州許可證的男子為例，指出某些司法管轄區對州際遊客的對待方式，彷彿將其視為「可疑的外國人」。核心論點是，此類做法有損美國最高法院所確立的一般自衛權，並為美國公民製造了不必要的法律障礙。政策意涵著重於利用法律挑戰（例如提交『友邦意見書』/amicus briefs），迫使州法院尊重外州的許可證，從而確保基本權利在所有州界都能得到一致的保護。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the United States' aggressive use of tariffs and economic coercion is counterproductive, inspiring international partners to actively circumvent US markets. Instead of increasing dependency on American trade, major global players are deepening cooperation by establishing new free trade agreements (e.g., EU-India, ACFTA, CPTPP) that explicitly exclude the U.S. This trend signals a significant shift toward increased global economic integration outside of US influence. Policymakers should recognize this accelerating decoupling, as it suggests that the traditional American model of trade leverage is rapidly diminishing unless the U.S. commits to upholding multilateral rules and reducing protectionism.
-
3.
The article argues that passing a Continuing Resolution (CR), while preventing an immediate government shutdown, merely preserves an unsustainable fiscal status quo rather than addressing underlying budgetary crises. Congress is criticized for using the CR as an escape route from difficult choices—such as cutting programs or tackling massive deficits—while simultaneously planning to increase debt through reconciliation packages for defense and agriculture. The core problem remains mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare) driving debt unsustainably. For genuine fiscal stability, the author advises that Congress must move beyond short-term funding measures, prioritize essential functions, and establish a dedicated process to impose discipline on mandatory programs.
-
4.
The article argues that inheritance and estate taxes are detrimental to economic growth, investment, and productivity. Citing Sweden's experience after abolishing the gift and inheritance tax in 2005, the author notes subsequent increases in firm profitability, net sales, and asset values. The core reasoning suggests that removing these taxes allows owner-managers to reinvest capital directly into their companies rather than withdrawing funds for anticipated future tax liabilities. This increased internal investment has been shown to boost corporate financial health and higher corporate income tax payments.
-
5.
The CATO article argues that the US-Venezuela oil deal is deeply problematic due to significant governance and ethical concerns. Key criticisms include a lack of transparency in negotiations, the expansion of state corporatism through government involvement in resource extraction, and questionable legality since it bypasses Venezuelan constitutional requirements. Furthermore, the agreement utilizes a notoriously corrupt private partner and sidelines the democratic opposition, severely undermining US credibility and future diplomatic efforts. Strategically, the deal is viewed as an ill-advised 'imperial resource grab' that risks damaging long-term American influence in Latin America.