The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Don’t Pause the Gas Tax—Repeal It
English Summary
The CATO argues that temporary gas tax holidays are merely political gimmicks and that Congress should instead permanently repeal the federal gas tax. While acknowledging that the war in Iran is the primary driver of high gas prices, the publication advocates for repealing the tax and devolving highway funding entirely to state and local governments. This decentralization is presented as a more efficient and less bureaucratic solution, allowing states—which are best positioned to assess local infrastructure needs—to manage funding through their own tax mechanisms. The policy implication is that Congress must use the upcoming highway bill reauthorization to permanently repeal the tax, thereby lowering prices and reducing federal overreach.
中文摘要
CATO主張，臨時燃油稅假期僅是政治噱頭，國會應永久廢除聯邦燃油稅。雖然該出版物承認伊朗戰爭是高油價的主要驅動因素，但它仍主張廢除該稅，並將高速公路資金完全下放給州和地方政府。將此去中心化機制呈現為更有效率、更少官僚作舉的解決方案，讓州政府（它們最適合評估地方基礎設施需求）能夠透過自身的稅收機制來管理資金。其政策意涵是，國會必須利用即將到來的公路法案重新授權，永久廢除該稅，從而降低價格並減少聯邦政府的過度干預。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.