The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Government by Deal, Corruption by Design
English Summary
The article argues that the current administration's industrial policy, which involves government equity stakes in private companies, constitutes 'corruption by design.' Key evidence cited includes the controversial Vulcan deal, where federal funding appeared linked to political figures, demonstrating that government power is being used to confer private benefits rather than through objective market mechanisms. This practice creates a patronage system that distorts investment, elevates politically favored firms (like those in the rare earth sector), and poses national security risks by steering capital toward companies that may not be technically ready. Policymakers must abandon the model of the government acting as a venture capitalist, as this undermines free enterprise and replaces market competition with political access.
中文摘要
本文論述了現行政府的產業政策，特別是其透過持有民營企業股權的方式，實質構成「制度性腐敗」。文章指出，包括備受爭議的Vulcan交易在內，提供了關鍵證據，顯示聯邦資金與政治人物存在關聯，證明政府權力被用於授予私人利益，而非透過客觀的市場機制。這種做法建立了一種庇護系統，扭曲了投資方向，抬升了政治上有利的企業（例如稀土產業），並因將資本導向可能尚未具備技術準備的企業，從而構成國家安全風險。政策制定者必須放棄政府充當風險投資者的模式，因為這會損害自由企業精神，並用政治關係取代市場競爭。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.