The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The Doomslayers Are Shaping America’s Energy Policy
English Summary
The article argues that centuries of pessimistic predictions about resource depletion have been repeatedly disproven by human innovation and adaptation. Drawing on economist Julian Simon's philosophy that human ingenuity is the 'ultimate resource,' the authors praise Secretary of Energy Chris Wright for adopting an optimistic approach to energy abundance rather than scarcity-based policies. They cite the shale revolution and recent policy shifts—such as energy superabundance workshops and Operation Gigawatt—as evidence that the US government is embracing innovation-driven energy strategy. The implication is that private sector-led, decentralized innovation rather than government planning drives progress, and meeting global energy demands requires policy frameworks encouraging experimentation and risk-taking.
中文摘要
本文論述了數世紀以來，關於資源枯竭的悲觀預測，皆已被人類的創新與適應能力所不斷證偽。文章援引了經濟學家朱利安·西蒙（Julian Simon）的理念，即人類的創造力是「終極資源」，並讚揚能源部長克里斯·賴特（Chris Wright）採取了樂觀的能源豐裕觀點，而非基於稀缺性的政策思維。作者們以頁岩革命（shale revolution）和近期政策轉變——例如能源超級豐裕工作坊（energy superabundance workshops）和「吉瓦特行動」（Operation Gigawatt）——為例證，指出美國政府正積極擁抱由創新驅動的能源戰略。其核心啟示是，推動進步的動力源於私營部門主導的、去中心化的創新，而非政府的規劃。因此，要滿足全球能源需求，必須建立鼓勵實驗和承擔風險的政策框架。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.