The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
What are trimmed mean and median inflation rates? And why does Kevin Warsh prefer them?
English Summary
The Brookings article analyzes alternative inflation metrics, such as the trimmed mean and median, which proponents argue are superior to traditional core indices because they statistically filter out extreme price outliers (noise). These methods remove the most volatile price changes from the distribution, aiming to provide a cleaner, more accurate measure of underlying inflation and economic slack. While these metrics are useful for identifying long-term trends, the analysis cautions that they can systematically understate inflation during periods of large, one-time shocks (e.g., tariffs or energy crises). Policymakers must be aware that relying solely on these filtered metrics could lead to misjudgments of the true inflationary trajectory, potentially impacting monetary policy decisions.
中文摘要
該布魯金斯學會的文章分析了替代性通貨膨脹指標，例如剔除平均值和中位數。支持者認為這些指標優於傳統核心指數，因為它們能在統計學上過濾掉極端的價格異常值（即「雜訊」）。這些方法旨在移除價格分佈中最具波動性的變動，從而提供衡量潛在通貨膨脹和經濟鬆弛度更清晰、更準確的指標。雖然這些指標有助於識別長期趨勢，但該分析警告指出，在經歷大型、一次性衝擊（例如關稅或能源危機）的時期，它們可能會系統性地低估通貨膨脹。政策制定者必須意識到，單獨依賴這些經過過濾的指標可能會導致對真實通貨膨脹軌跡的誤判，進而影響貨幣政策的決策。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
-
5.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.