The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Brown Center scholars reflect on education after 1 year of the Trump administration
English Summary
Brookings scholars analyze the second Trump administration's first year of education policy, highlighting a paradoxical strategy of dismantling federal bureaucracy while aggressively using civil rights enforcement to advance culture-war priorities. Key actions include slashing Department of Education staff, ending DEI initiatives despite empirical evidence of their value, and withholding funds from institutions over campus protests and transgender policies. The analysis suggests that while executive orders have significantly restructured the federal role, long-term impact remains uncertain due to ongoing litigation and the need for Congressional support to terminate major programs like IDEA and Title I.
中文摘要
布魯金斯學會學者分析第二任川普政府首年的教育政策，指出其採取了一種矛盾策略：在拆解聯邦官僚體系的同時，積極動用民權執法以推進文化戰爭的優先議程。關鍵行動包括大幅裁減教育部員額、無視實證成效終止多元、公平與包容（DEI）倡議，並針對校園抗議及跨性別政策扣留機構經費。分析顯示，儘管行政命令已顯著重塑聯邦政府的角色，但受限於持續的法律訴訟，且終止《身心障礙者教育法》（IDEA）與《第一章》（Title I）等重大計畫仍需國會支持，其長期影響仍具不確定性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.