The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
How to bridge the global AI divide
English Summary
The article argues that artificial intelligence's concentration in the Global North—where 75% of new data center capacity is being built and advanced economies score double the AI readiness of low-income countries—threatens to widen global inequality unless addressed through deliberate policy intervention. The Global South generates vast data streams yet lacks local infrastructure to process them, resulting in 'digital extractivism' where value accrues abroad. Solutions include South-South cooperation, leveraging renewable energy advantages, building sovereign digital public infrastructure models (like India's subsidized GPU access for startups), and redefining global AI governance to center rather than marginalize the Global South. Without strategic action, this divide will harden into structural inequality; with proper intervention, Global South countries can leapfrog legacy systems and shape AI's future.
中文摘要
本文指出，人工智慧的發展高度集中於全球北方（Global North）——此區域不僅建構了75%的新數據中心容量，且進步經濟體的AI就緒程度也遠超低收入國家——這種現象威脅著加劇全球不平等，除非透過有意識的政策干預來應對。全球南方（Global South）雖然產生了龐大的數據流，卻缺乏本地的處理基礎設施，導致了「數位提取主義」（digital extractivism），使得價值流向國外。解決方案包括促進南南合作、利用再生能源的優勢、建立主權數位公共基礎設施模式（例如印度為新創公司提供的補貼式GPU使用權），以及重新定義全球AI治理，使其以全球南方為核心而非邊緣化。若缺乏戰略行動，這種鴻溝將固化為結構性不平等；反之，若進行適當的干預，全球南方國家便能跳過傳統系統，主導AI的未來發展。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
-
5.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.