The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Shock, awe, and economic fallout
English Summary
This Brookings study, published in June 2026, investigates the economic fallout of the 2025 administration’s aggressive interior immigration enforcement campaign, dubbed "shock and awe." The research demonstrates that the intensified ICE operations, characterized by high-profile raids and arrests, resulted in a significant loss of jobs – 668,000 across 86 cities – impacting both immigrant and American-born workers. Utilizing a comparative analysis of cities with and without heightened ICE activity, the study found that the enforcement surge triggered a decline in employment, particularly in immigrant-intensive sectors, and exacerbated broader economic disruption through reduced consumer spending and business operations. The findings highlight the unintended consequences of a purely enforcement-based approach to immigration policy and underscore the importance of pairing enforcement with pathways for legal migration to mitigate negative economic impacts.
中文摘要
本 Brookings 研究所於 2026 年 6 月發佈的研究報告探討了 2025 年政府推行的強硬內地移民執法行動——「震懾瓦解」戰略所造成的經濟後果。研究顯示，ICE 作戰行動的加劇，藉由高調的突襲逮捕，導致失業人數大幅增加，在 86 個城市中計 668,000 人，對移民和美國本土工人均造成影響。透過比較具有和沒有加強 ICE 活動的城市，該研究發現，執法力度增加導致就業下降，尤其是在高度依賴移民的產業中，並透過降低消費者支出和企業運營，加劇了更廣泛的經濟動盪。研究結果凸顯了以純粹執法為基礎的移民政策所帶來的意想不到的後果，並強調了將執法與合法移民的通道結合的重要性，以減輕負面的經濟影響。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.