ThinkTankWeekly

Can the United States and Europe still cooperate in the Middle East?

Brookings | 2026-05-30 | middle_east

Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

Transatlantic cooperation between the U.S. and Europe in the Middle East is currently severely strained due to deep policy divisions over Gaza and Iran, compounded by U.S. unilateral actions and political hostility. While shared interests exist, the current climate—marked by disagreements on international law, the use of force, and U.S. support for Israel—makes major cooperation unlikely in the short term. However, the analysis suggests that Europe can enhance its influence by overcoming internal divisions and leveraging its independent capacity for humanitarian aid, sanctions, and investment. Ultimately, for cooperation to resume, the U.S. must adopt a more aligned and cooperative policy approach.

中文摘要

美國與歐洲在中東的跨大西洋合作目前因加薩和伊朗問題的深刻政策分歧,以及美國的單邊行動和政治敵意而處於極度緊張的狀態。儘管雙方存在共同利益,但當前氣氛——體現在國際法、武力使用以及美國對以色列的支持等議題上的分歧——使得短期內進行重大合作的可能性極低。然而,本分析指出,歐洲若能克服內部分歧,並發揮其在人道援助、制裁和投資方面的獨立能力,便能提升其影響力。最終而言,若要恢復合作,美國必須採取更具一致性和合作性的政策方針。

Related Entries

  1. 1.

    The rapid financing of the AI boom through massive corporate debt issuance is creating significant stress on global financial markets. This influx of private capital forces competition with government Treasury bonds, as AI companies offer higher yields than equivalent sovereign debt, thereby pushing up long-term interest rates. While this signals strong investment demand for AI, it raises concerns about systemic risk and the potential destabilization of core bond markets. Policymakers must navigate the tension between fueling critical technological growth and maintaining stable public borrowing costs to prevent a financial crisis.

    Read at CFR

  2. 2.
    2026-09-02 | europe | 2026-W36 | Topics: United States

    The article argues that while Ratko Mladić was convicted for the Srebrenica genocide, a second alleged campaign targeting Bosnian Muslims in six municipalities during 1992 is crucial to understanding his full criminal scope. Although the main trial judges acquitted him on the 1992 charge due to legal difficulties proving 'specific intent,' two dissenting appeals judges strongly argued that Mladić's high level of command and knowledge implied genocidal intent. This case highlights both the immense challenge in establishing genocide under international law—particularly proving specific intent—and underscores the critical importance of reviewing dissenting judicial opinions for setting future precedents in war crimes accountability.

    Read at CFR

  3. 3.
    2026-09-02 | europe | 2026-W36 | Topics: Climate, Europe, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine

    The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.

    Read at Chatham House

  4. 4.
    2026-09-02 | africa | 2026-W36 | Topics: Europe

    The Chatham House analysis argues that for Zambia to sustain its economic reforms and attract vital foreign investment, President Hichilema must prioritize preserving democratic institutions during the upcoming election. While macroeconomic stabilization has restored international confidence, political legitimacy hinges on a credible electoral process, as voters are yet to feel the benefits of abstract financial rehabilitation. Consequently, international allies are advised to act as 'critical friends,' ensuring that their support for economic stability is consistently coupled with demands for institutional integrity and democratic restraint. This balanced approach is vital to prevent authoritarian drift from undermining Zambia's foundational political capital.

    Read at Chatham House

  5. 5.
    2026-09-02 | middle_east | 2026-W36 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Six months after the U.S.-Israel attack on Iran, experts conclude that Washington has suffered a strategic defeat due to underestimating Iran's resilience and capacity for resistance. The conflict has significantly heightened regional instability, fueling sophisticated online propaganda from Tehran that creates a dangerous content advantage for radicalization efforts against U.S. interests. Furthermore, the war is paradoxically benefiting Turkey, which is consolidating its power through new regional security agreements, thus reducing overall U.S. influence in the Middle East. Policymakers must urgently counter Iran's ideological warfare and prepare for a shifting balance of power that diminishes American hegemony.

    Read at CFR