The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Can the United States and Europe still cooperate in the Middle East?
English Summary
Transatlantic cooperation between the U.S. and Europe in the Middle East is currently severely strained due to deep policy divisions over Gaza and Iran, compounded by U.S. unilateral actions and political hostility. While shared interests exist, the current climate—marked by disagreements on international law, the use of force, and U.S. support for Israel—makes major cooperation unlikely in the short term. However, the analysis suggests that Europe can enhance its influence by overcoming internal divisions and leveraging its independent capacity for humanitarian aid, sanctions, and investment. Ultimately, for cooperation to resume, the U.S. must adopt a more aligned and cooperative policy approach.
中文摘要
美國與歐洲在中東的跨大西洋合作目前因加薩和伊朗問題的深刻政策分歧，以及美國的單邊行動和政治敵意而處於極度緊張的狀態。儘管雙方存在共同利益，但當前氣氛——體現在國際法、武力使用以及美國對以色列的支持等議題上的分歧——使得短期內進行重大合作的可能性極低。然而，本分析指出，歐洲若能克服內部分歧，並發揮其在人道援助、制裁和投資方面的獨立能力，便能提升其影響力。最終而言，若要恢復合作，美國必須採取更具一致性和合作性的政策方針。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.