The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Metro Monitor 2026: The relationship between immigration and regional economic performance over the past decade
English Summary
The Brookings Metro Monitor 2026 report demonstrates that U.S. metropolitan areas with growing immigrant populations achieved superior economic performance, including higher GMP growth and productivity, between 2014 and 2024. The study finds no evidence that immigration harms native-born workers; instead, those in high-immigration regions saw higher employment rates and median earnings than their counterparts in low-immigration areas. These findings challenge the economic rationale behind mass deportations, suggesting such policies risk shrinking the national workforce by 2.4 million and reducing GDP by 7% by 2028. To sustain regional vitality, the report argues that federal and local leaders must prioritize policies that attract and integrate foreign-born talent rather than restricting it.
中文摘要
《布魯金斯大都會觀測 2026》（Brookings Metro Monitor 2026）報告顯示，在 2014 年至 2024 年間，移民人口增長的美國大都會地區展現出更優越的經濟表現，包括更高的城市生產總值（GMP）增長與生產力。研究發現，並無證據顯示移民會損害本土出生勞工的利益；相反地，高移民地區勞工的就業率與收入中位數均高於低移民地區。這些發現挑戰了大規模驅逐政策的經濟合理性，並指出此類政策可能導致 2028 年前全國勞動力減少 240 萬人，且 GDP 縮減 7%。為維持地區活力，報告主張聯邦與地方領袖應優先採取吸引並整合外籍人才的政策，而非對其進行限制。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.