The rapid financing of the AI boom through massive corporate debt issuance is creating significant stress on global financial markets. This influx of private capital forces competition with government Treasury bonds, as AI companies offer higher yields than equivalent sovereign debt, thereby pushing up long-term interest rates. While this signals strong investment demand for AI, it raises concerns about systemic risk and the potential destabilization of core bond markets. Policymakers must navigate the tension between fueling critical technological growth and maintaining stable public borrowing costs to prevent a financial crisis.
Did ‘America First’ tariffs work?
English Summary
The 'America First' tariffs of 2025-2026 have not triggered an immediate recession, largely due to the U.S. economy's resilience and the relatively small role of traded goods in its overall GDP. However, the policy marks a definitive end to the post-WWII rules-based trade order, as tariffs are increasingly used as tools for foreign policy leverage and economic statecraft rather than mere industry protection. While businesses have adapted in the short term, experts warn of long-term consequences including persistent inflationary pressure and reduced economic competition. Ultimately, the shift necessitates a new national consensus to balance the benefits of open trade against the strategic risks of dependency on geopolitical adversaries.
中文摘要
2025-2026 年的「美國優先」關稅並未引發即時的經濟衰退，很大程度歸因於美國經濟的韌性，以及貿易商品在整體 GDP 中佔比相對較低。然而，這項政策標誌著二戰後以規則為基礎的貿易秩序之終結，因為關稅已日益轉向作為外交政策籌碼與經濟手段（economic statecraft），而非僅具產業保護功能。儘管企業在短期內已作調整，專家仍警告長期後果，包括持續的通膨壓力和經濟競爭下降。最終，此一轉變需要建立新的國家共識，以在開放貿易的利益與依賴地緣政治對手的戰略風險之間取得平衡。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that while Ratko Mladić was convicted for the Srebrenica genocide, a second alleged campaign targeting Bosnian Muslims in six municipalities during 1992 is crucial to understanding his full criminal scope. Although the main trial judges acquitted him on the 1992 charge due to legal difficulties proving 'specific intent,' two dissenting appeals judges strongly argued that Mladić's high level of command and knowledge implied genocidal intent. This case highlights both the immense challenge in establishing genocide under international law—particularly proving specific intent—and underscores the critical importance of reviewing dissenting judicial opinions for setting future precedents in war crimes accountability.
-
3.Wildfires and extreme heat show climate change is now Europe’s biggest security threat (Chatham House)
The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.
-
4.
Six months after the U.S.-Israel attack on Iran, experts conclude that Washington has suffered a strategic defeat due to underestimating Iran's resilience and capacity for resistance. The conflict has significantly heightened regional instability, fueling sophisticated online propaganda from Tehran that creates a dangerous content advantage for radicalization efforts against U.S. interests. Furthermore, the war is paradoxically benefiting Turkey, which is consolidating its power through new regional security agreements, thus reducing overall U.S. influence in the Middle East. Policymakers must urgently counter Iran's ideological warfare and prepare for a shifting balance of power that diminishes American hegemony.
-
5.
The widespread operational embedding of AI in global supply chains creates significant systemic dependencies on shared digital infrastructure, raising novel aggregation risks for the insurance market. These risks are not limited to model failure but stem from common vulnerabilities—such as shared cloud platforms or flawed models—that could simultaneously impact multiple seemingly independent firms. Policy implications require both operators and insurers to shift focus toward managing these interconnected weaknesses by establishing robust controls, including mandatory human oversight, detailed audit trails, and staged deployments. Insurers must update underwriting practices to map systemic technology dependencies across policyholders rather than treating AI exposure as a standalone risk.