The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Did ‘America First’ tariffs work?
English Summary
The 'America First' tariffs of 2025-2026 have not triggered an immediate recession, largely due to the U.S. economy's resilience and the relatively small role of traded goods in its overall GDP. However, the policy marks a definitive end to the post-WWII rules-based trade order, as tariffs are increasingly used as tools for foreign policy leverage and economic statecraft rather than mere industry protection. While businesses have adapted in the short term, experts warn of long-term consequences including persistent inflationary pressure and reduced economic competition. Ultimately, the shift necessitates a new national consensus to balance the benefits of open trade against the strategic risks of dependency on geopolitical adversaries.
中文摘要
2025-2026 年的「美國優先」關稅並未引發即時的經濟衰退，很大程度歸因於美國經濟的韌性，以及貿易商品在整體 GDP 中佔比相對較低。然而，這項政策標誌著二戰後以規則為基礎的貿易秩序之終結，因為關稅已日益轉向作為外交政策籌碼與經濟手段（economic statecraft），而非僅具產業保護功能。儘管企業在短期內已作調整，專家仍警告長期後果，包括持續的通膨壓力和經濟競爭下降。最終，此一轉變需要建立新的國家共識，以在開放貿易的利益與依賴地緣政治對手的戰略風險之間取得平衡。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
-
5.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.