ThinkTankWeekly

Ukraine, Iran, and the strains on Russian and American power

Brookings | 2026-06-12 | defense

Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The article argues that Russia's prolonged war in Ukraine and the U.S.'s 2026 Iran conflict have revealed the limits of superpower dominance, as both Putin and Trump's military miscalculations have trapped them in costly, unwinnable conflicts that are undermining their global credibility. Ukraine and Iran, despite being militarily weaker, have inflicted massive casualties and costs on their attackers, forcing both superpowers to recognize they cannot impose their will and are losing traditional allies seeking independent security arrangements. The simultaneous distraction of both superpowers is accelerating a shift toward decentralized global security, with Europe recognizing Ukraine as a credible military asset and developing independent defense capabilities rather than relying on American guarantees. The article recommends that regional groupings like the Joint Expeditionary Force take a leading role in security coordination and that Europe facilitate an end to the Russia-Ukraine war independent of U.S. involvement.

中文摘要

本文論述,俄羅斯在烏克蘭持續的戰爭以及美國預計於2026年發生的伊朗衝突,已揭示了超級大國主導地位的極限。由於普丁和川普兩人的軍事誤判,他們被困於成本高昂且難以取勝的衝突中,這正在削弱其全球公信力。烏克蘭和伊朗儘管軍事力量較弱,卻對攻擊方造成了巨大的傷亡和經濟損失,迫使兩大超級大國意識到,它們無法強加自己的意志,並且正在失去傳統盟友,這些盟友正尋求獨立的安全安排。兩大超級大國同時分心,正在加速推動全球安全模式向去中心化轉移。歐洲正在將烏克蘭視為一個可信的軍事資產,並發展獨立的國防能力,而非依賴美國的保證。本文建議,像聯合遠征部隊(Joint Expeditionary Force)這樣的區域性集團應在安全協調中發揮主導作用,並且歐洲應促成一場獨立於美國參與的俄烏戰爭終結。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-11-07 | defense | 2026-W45 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-11-07 | middle_east | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Europe, Trade

    China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  4. 4.
    2026-11-07 | society | 2026-W45

    The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.

    Read at Brookings

  5. 5.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.

    Read at CFR